|
Charles
Hale and Elizabeth Jelin
Conflict,
Memory and Transitions Colloquium
November
11,
2000
|
Andrés
Alvarado
 |
|
From
left: Professor Charles Hale, Professor Beatriz
Manz and Professor
Elizabeth Jelin
|
Elizabeth
Jelin and Charles Hale led a discussion that analyzed the
shaping and transmission of collective memory. Jelin initiated
the dialogue by arguing that during and after the repressive
periods carried out under dictatorships in some Latin American
countries in the 1970s and 1980s, the winners were able to
dictate history. Their hegemonic histories invariably obscured
counter-memories that were hidden and struggles that were
oppressed. Not until democracies were reestablished were
spaces opened up to allow for transitions and the plurality
of memories to emerge. Under these democratic circumstances,
memory may be challenged and contested, and the resulting
struggle may lead to a new phase in the development of a
collective memory. In Argentina, she explained, the human
rights movement proved critical to this process at a time
when Alfonsin attempted to restrain mobilization regarding
the past. In the movement's efforts to spur the government
to more action, the issue of memory became central to the
human rights' agenda. An ingenious campaign was crafted around
the slogan of 'Nunca Mas' (Never Again), which forced society
to revisit its recent history in order to fulfill the campaign's
basic premise of forever preventing a repetition of the horrors
of the past. Since 1995, increased activity to open an even
greater space for the discussion of memory has produced a
surge in commemorations, books and other memory-related activities.
Jelin
and Hale both agreed that these processes usually require
'distance' to develop and to allow for memory to 'come out'.
Fear is still the most important factor impeding the transmission
of memory; many argue that 'true testimony is still that
one that does not come out'. Nonetheless, Hale pointed out
that recently books revealing "counter-memories" have emerged
independent of the support of the human rights movement.
Also, former armed actors are now analyzing and writing about
their past projects. Hale believes that there is an important
window of opportunity of about 5 to 10 years during which
this process will intensify and then will consolidate an
alternative memory of the recent past.
|
|
|