Catha
Worthman
Owen
Herrnstadt, Director of International Affairs for the 720,000
member Machinists Union, recently spoke to
a graduate seminar on Labor and Globalization hosted at
the Center for Latin American Studies. When he thinks of
the
global economy, Herrnstadt said, he remembers a trip he
took to Vietnam to investigate labor rights abuses. In Hanoi,
he saw two young children trying to sleep in a window-sill
on the outside of a building at the edge of a busy traffic
circle. Skinny and barely clothed, they were just five
minutes
away from the new Hanoi Hilton, with its in-laid mahogany,
multiple restaurants, bars, and swimming pools. "The
children and the Hotel's business customers might seem separate," Herrnstadt
reflected, "but they are connected. The businessmen
are engaged in a race to the top, and the children are experiencing
the race to the bottom that the businessmen take advantage
of."
To
develop their strategies to confront the global economy,
the Machinists must understand how the situations they face
are also connected to those of the children and businessmen
in Vietnam. Globalization has caused devastating consequences
for the Machinists as it has for other workers in the United
States. Herrnstadt estimates that 443,000 U.S. jobs have
been lost since the implementation of NAFTA, though precise
quantification is difficult. These numbers do not account
for the jobs lost through the process known as "lean
manufacturing," in which manufacturers contract out
everything but their core jobs and subcontract work at lower
labor costs, both within the U.S. and abroad. As for the
promise that increased exports would cause more jobs, Herrnstadt
questions the quality of those jobs, and notes that any numerical
gains have been far outweighed by the losses. Herrnstadt
emphasized that "the number one issue facing our members
today is job security."
While
they examine these difficult issues, the Machinists are also
taking action. "I am proud," Herrnstadt said, "that
10,000 machinists marched in the peaceful demonstrations
at Seattle outside the WTO last August." Importantly,
the Machinists have been organizing actively within the United
States to rebuild their membership losses, with an 80% win
rate since 1990. Other strategies the Machinists are implementing
include developing international labor solidarity, cross-border
organization, and even international collective bargaining.
As
a leader within the Union who works every day to construct
these relationships of international solidarity, Herrnstadt
offered a refreshingly practical assessment of the difficulties
involved. Labor laws, systems of labor-management relationships,
and internal union structures vary from country to country.
Aside from sometimes conflicting ideologies or immediate
needs, unions must find ways to communicate quickly and regularly.
Herrnstadt said he would like to trace all the Machinists' work
which has moved to Mexico, for example, in order to develop
relations with workers there. But getting such information
would require massive resources.
Despite
these difficulties, the Machinists have pioneered efforts
at coordinating international labor activity. For example,
they participate actively in the International Metalworkers
Federation (an international trade secretariat), and filed
joint complaints with Mexican unions through the mechanisms
established under the NAFTA labor side agreement. Although
the complaint mechanism has failed completely as a method
for developing enforceable sanctions, Herrnstadt said, it
has facilitated some cross-border cooperation.
Throughout,
Herrnstadt emphasized that the Machinists Union membership
was actively involved in setting policies and establishing
strategic directions for the union. New methods of communication
like the worldwide web have facilitated direct member input
into global trade strategy. One challenge is how to harness
this communication to collaborate with other unions internationally.
Another challenge is the attitudes of multi-national corporate
executives. Herrnstadt summarized a comment by Jack Welsh,
former C.E.O. of General Electric, with whom the Machinists
have one of their most important union contracts. Welch has
said "the ideal factory would be built on a barge" so it
could be hauled around the world to low-wage areas, where
it could operate without labor rules, environmental protections
or other standards.