José Gregori
"Human
Rights in Brazil"
May
3, 1999
|
Misha Klein
José Gregori, Brazilian Secretary
of State for Human Rights addressed a multidisciplinary audience
at UC Berkeley in the afternoon of Monday, May 3, on the issue
of "Human Rights in Brazil." Gregori's Berkeley presentation
was followed by comments by Professor Connie De La Vega,
of the University of San Francisco and Board Member of Human
Rights
Advocates, and Professor Naomi Roht-Arriaza, of the University
of California, Hastings College of the Law.
 |
From
left to right: José Gregori, Fabrizio
Rigout, Harley Shaiken. |
Following
a brief introduction by Professor Harley Shaiken, Director
of the Center for Latin American Studies, Secretary Gregori
offered an overview of the development of the National Program
for Human Rights in Brazil in 1995-6, which led to the creation
of a national-level secretariat of Human Rights, and most recently
to its elevation to the status of Ministry in January of this
year. Secretary Gregori emphasized the interactive nature of
the design and implementation of the Program, which was not
an exclusively official policy, but involved input and participation
from civil society and non-governmental organizations. This
ongoing interaction between government representatives and
NGOs has resulted in a broad-reaching program, which continues
to undergo modifications as the result of suggestions and criticisms
from those involved in the process of its implementation in
more regions within Brazil and more broadly within Brazilian
society.
 |
José Gregori |
Secretary
Gregori made a distinction between rhetorical programs and
the pragmatic approach of the current program, which addresses "intense
needs". Seeking results in the form of political and social
changes, the Secretary explained that the purpose of his visit
to the US and to Berkeley was far more than a question of publicity.
He has undertaken to establish networks of support and communication,
since the kind of far-reaching program being implemented in
Brazil has what he called "inductive" or "contaminating" effect,
which is to say that it has an effect on other sectors. He
went on to explain that the kind of program being implemented
in Brazil has consequences which cross borders of all sorts,
a theme which he explored further during his presentation,
and which was taken up later by the commentators. Following 20 years of military
rule, during which time the country had turned its back on
the human rights movement, Brazil made major efforts early
on to prioritize human rights by adhering to all international
pacts and initiatives on human rights. Secretary Gregori emphasized
the importance of a cooperative effort within the human rights
movement internationally, without one country dictating what
other countries should do. Since in the 20th century no country
is innocent where human rights are concerned, Secretary Gregori
underscored the importance of dialogue between countries, and
a posture of humility over one of arrogance.
Within Brazil, the first priority
has been to publicize the idea of human rights to the Brazilian
population. One of the major obstacles to the implementation
of the program has been a perception by the general population
that a push for human rights has been one which protects the
rights of criminals over those of victims, or citizens more
broadly. The National Program for Human Rights has been educating
the population on the concept of human rights as it is understood
today, which includes its incorporation at the personal level,
and the concept of leading lives based on the principles of
human rights.
Changing
attitudes toward human rights in Brazil requires that the "soul" of
the general population be reached. Only when these attitudes
change will it be possible
to bring about a change in conduct. Secretary Gregori explained
that this kind of change makes the work of his Ministry very
different from that of the other Ministries; building roads
and bridges, for example, does not involve changing the behavior
and inner self. The transformation of the written form of the
program into practice is not a simple, linear task, but requires
a dialectic process with advances and set backs.
A summary of the Program is available
in a bilingual printed handbook published by the Brazilian
Justice Department, which he made available to the audience.
Some of the highlighted features of the program include: Making
the police less violent; facilitating the judicial process
so that it operates more quickly; reducing impunity, especially
in the more remote regions of the country; reducing discrimination
against the more vulnerable segments of the population (such
as women, children, indigenous people, homosexuals, and disabled
people); and always following through on any denouncements
that reach the Ministry.
An example of the way that the
concept human rights is being continuously challenged and redefined
through practice and daily life is the inclusion of traffic
violence within the purview of the Ministry of Human Rights.
With 42,000 deaths and 100,000 injured in the year of 1995,
statistics equivalent to those of a civil war, traffic violence
warrants consideration as a human rights issue rather than
an issue to be solved by police or civil engineering. The new
traffic laws reflect this new perspective.
Secretary
Gregori also addressed the question of global economic changes
and crises and the
way in which these required a human rights response. The flight
of foreign capital and the "speculation attack" in Brazil were
stimulated by distorted international reporting which pictured
the country as being on the verge of economic collapse, even
though Brazil had not delayed any payments of foreign debts.
Since sudden and drastic economic changes have implications
for human rights, at a recent international conference Secretary
Gregori proposed the establishment of an NGO to study this
new global economy and how it affects human rights. He also
proposed that research centers like the University of California
at Berkeley should study financial topics from the perspective
of human rights.
At the end of his presentation,
Secretary Gregori returned to the theme of border-crossing,
cooperation, and the importance of taking advantage of a shared
forum to promote human rights. We have already seen how international
cooperation and solidarity have been critical to the pursuit
of issues such as the environment, the fight against AIDS,
and the problem of drug trafficking. He called for the creation
of a new space of social consensus.
Regarding
the relationship between global economic changes and human
rights, Secretary Gregori
concluded by stating that we must "globalize globalization," and
that the task of human rights advocates today is to invest
this issue with a sense of universality so that globalization
does not become a new name for the old imperialism.
Professor Connie De La Vega began
her comments by noting that there have been no comparable initiatives
in the US, and that the US has ratified very few of the international
treaties. She then concentrated her comments on the activities
of the Human Rights Advocates organization, which include education
on human rights laws, treaty ratification, and human rights
violations within the US. The US has been resistant to applying
international human rights laws within the US judicial system,
such as in the question of the death penalty for legal minors,
the US being one of only 6 countries which have a juvenile
death penalty.
International efforts are also
directed towards eliminating the death penalty entirely, and
towards the prevention of extradition to countries in which
the death penalty is practiced. The issue of Affirmative Action
also finds support in the international treaties on human rights,
which call for steps to be taken until racial equality has
been attained. Other issues touched on by Professor De La Vega
included the trafficking in women and children within the US,
migrant worker rights, which are violated all over the world,
and the connection between the issues of housing and violence
against women.
 |
Naomi
Roht-Arriaza |
Professor
Naomi Roht-Arriaza focused her comments on the Latin American
context and underscored the broadening of the nature of how
we think about human rights beyond the traditional set of issues
which have been associated with human rights over the years.
She reiterated many of the issues addressed by Secretary Gregori,
such as impunity dysfunctional judicial systems, and police
reform, since these themes reappear throughout Latin America.
She also added compensation for the victims of the dictatorships
to the list of concerns.
According
to Roht-Arriaza, one of the distressing concerns which has
been repeated throughout
the region has been how to deal with common crime within the
context of democratic government. The right wing has portrayed
the push for increased human rights as leading to policies
that "coddle criminals" in a context of increasing crime rates.
Under these politicized circumstances, the ratification of
human rights treaties and their inclusion in the international
human rights system becomes increasingly important.
The
new notion of human rights--what Professor Roht-Arriaza called
the "hallmark of our time"--includes
more than just traditional civil and political rights. Economic,
cultural, and social rights figure prominently in human rights'
latest incarnation. Other issues which are increasingly placed
under the rubric of "human rights" are health, a healthy environment,
land reform, and drug trafficking, among others. This broader
spectrum of issues makes new integration possible, with cooperation
between organizations like Amnesty International and the Sierra
Club taking place in the interest of preventing the repression
of environmental activists. Like Gregori, Professor Roht-Arriaza
included financial markets, corporations, and trade and global
finance in the new human rights issues.
One
example of the kind of expanding international dialogue on
human rights which was brought up
in response to a question from the audience is inclusion of
women's rights within human rights, and the implementation
of the UN treaty on women's rights which was drawn up in Beijing
during the 1995 international women's conference. The participation
of representatives from Brazil in the conference resulted in
the creation of women's police stations in São Paulo, and then
in the rest of Brazil, a model which is now being implemented
in San Francisco, California. Secretary Gregori credited the
Brazilian feminist movement with transforming the status of
women from that of legal minor only 17 years ago to near juridical
equality with men today. The establishment of the women's police
stations is a further step towards addressing other kinds of
inequalities expressed in violence against women. He also stressed
the importance of women's participation in the struggle for
human rights, since women activists are able to bring with
them their knowledge from participation in feminist causes.
Another
question addressed the role of the district attorneys in the
pursuit of the end of
impunity. Secretary Gregori expressed concern about recent
events which evidenced the need for careful implementation
of new policies. The final question came from the Brazilian
Consul, José Lindgren, about the new voluntary civil service
for those over 18 who have not performed military service.
This new program has the double benefit of providing young
people with training and work experience and bringing assistance
to communities in need throughout Brazil. These kinds of programs
have human rights implications when human rights is understood
to encompass the broader categories of economic and social
justice discussed by Secretary Gregori and the commentators.
In December 1998, on the 50th anniversary
of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Secretary Gregori
received the prestigious United Nations Human Rights Award
in recognition of a lifetime of commitment and achievement
on Human Rights in Brazil. For more than a decade, Gregori
campaigned against torture and killings associated with the
military regime's repression of political opposition. Having
worked cooperatively with NGOs, Secretary Gregori's efforts
resulted in several programs which complement public policy
in the area of citizenship rights. Previous award winners include
Nelson Mandela, Jimmy Carter, Martin Luther King, Jr., and
Eleanor Roosevelt. Gregori has been the principal architect
of the government's current human rights policy and has headed
the human rights office since its inception in March 1997.
 |
From
left: panelist Connie De La Vega responds to a question
as Naomi Roht-Arriaza, José Gregori, and Fabrizio
Rigout look
on. |
|