Summer 2002 Research Report

Gisele Henriques
Goldman School of Public Policy

"Organizing to Revitalize the São Francisco River: The Truká people, local fishermen, the church and NGOs"

These rocks, located in the indigenous land of the Truka people, used to be covered by water, and show how much the river has dried up.


“It is believed that a long time ago, deep in the heart of the Canastra Mountains in Minas Gerais, Brazil, there was a beautiful young Indian girl named Iati. In her time, there was a great war and Iati’s lover was called to defend their land and their people from the invaders. But the invaders were many, with great powers and ammunition, and the Indian warriors sank in the wrinkles of the deep forest.

Iati, sad and alone, cried copiously until the last days of her life. Her desperate tears formed the waterfall whose waters follow the sunken footsteps of the Indian warriors, forming the great river-sea, known to the Indians then as Opará, and to us today as the São Francisco River”. – Legend of the tears of Iati


The Truká People

This popular legend is well known to the 15 million inhabitants of the São Francisco River Valley. The Truká are an indigenous people, living on an island halfway between two large dams, Itaparica and Sobradinho. In addition to the Truká there are 17 other indigenous tribes living along the São Francisco River. The river runs 2.700 km from spring to sea, through 5 states in the Northeastern Region of Brazil. Fifty eight percent of its course cuts through the sertão, Brazil’s semi-arid region, plagued by drought and famine. The importance of this river, documented through verse and prose by its inhabitants, could not halt its continued degradation. In the 500 years since its “discovery” by Europeans, the river has been suffering a long process of dilapidation due to non-sustainable water and development policies.

The Truká have been expelled from their land along the river numerous times since Europeans came to colonize the region. They were forced to live generations in exile. Finally in the 1970’s they returned, committed to securing their land and water rights. Ailson Truká, the local chief says, “The River is the life vein of my people. In 1979 they started to imprison him by building dams and since then we have been paying a very high price”. To the Truká this high price includes a decrease in the volume of water around their island, high levels of pollution and water related diseases, and the extinction of the native fish population. This is because today the river is used to supply water for urban, rural and industrial needs, generate electricity, and provide water for the region’s many irrigation projects. There are currently 7 hydroelectric power plants in the river basin alone, not including those in the tributaries. The environmental problems afflicting the river have caused damage to the ecosystem, thereby causing disequilibria to the way of life of the Truká and other riverine communities.

Neguin Truká, a local organizer, explained “I saw my grandfather suffer because he was illiterate. They took advantage of him because of that, and today we have to organize ourselves to fight for what is ours. Our grandfathers taught us that we have to follow our traditions to the death”. It is in this spirit that the Truká people have joined civil society’s current push to revitalize the São Francisco River. Members of riverine communities, such as indigenous people, fishermen, the Catholic Church, and environmentalists are organizing to rescue their beloved Opará. Their acts of resistance are currently organized under the banner of the revitalization project that was once a government conception, but is now a loosely identified local strategy to raise consciousness and preservation efforts. Originally, the efforts for revitalization were part of a government initiative, which in 2001 awarded the project $84 million Reais (about $22 million US) in funds. The funds were meant to support state initiatives to preserve the river, but about one third of the money has disappeared and since 2001. There have been no more funds allocated for this cause. As a result, civil society has taken responsibility for continuing these efforts and defining revitalization for the river based on their own needs and realities.

Ailson Truká is wary of government involvement in the river stating, “ The issue of preservation is quite complex and dangerous, and we run many risks because in organizing we are directly confronting the government and large business interests. Any political action taken by the people is not respected by the government and can easily lead to repression”. Nonetheless they have taken part in actions, both local and nationwide, to advocate a halt to destructive deforestation along the riverbanks and push for adequate sewage treatment for the 504 municipalities located along river. They have also sparked ecological consciousness through environmental education in their territory. To them the revitalization of the river will only occur if there is unity among all interested social movements. Only then will they have the leverage to confront the government and demand a halt to the destructive profit seeking policies that have plagued the river.

Ailson says his people have been particularly hurt by the decimation of local fish species, “Years ago we used to leave a pot of water boiling, throw the line into the river and return shortly with fish to cook. Today, because of all of the pollution and the great walls that interfere with the upstream run of the fish, we can no longer rely on local fish, we have to buy them from outside markets instead”. Xico Truká, one of the tribe’s shamans laments the disappearance of the fish and with them an activity that marked their way of life: fishing. “The golden fish used to leap out of the water and smack our chests when we crossed the river in our canoes”.

Amidst the destruction of their beloved Opará, the Truká are finding a political voice and an opportunity to join the rest of civil society in fighting for the preservation of the river. According to Xico Truká, “Our warring spirit is our divine enchantment”.


Children performing at the Romaria, a religious gathering
to discuss land and water.

The Fishermen


The fish that were once strong
Swam all along
In their upstream run to spawn
Today the dams control the tides
And the fish can no longer ride
From the ocean to the spring nor
From the spring to the ocean
- Zé da Feira – local poet


Today the original city of Remanso lies submerged mid-river next to the massive Sobradinho Dam. Almost twenty-five years ago the building of that dam displaced 72,000 people from 4 different cities, including Remanso. For many fishermen the São Francisco River was their patron. He supplied them with fish to earn a living. As a result of the dam the fishermen no longer call the São Francisco a river, but rather a lake. The dam formed the largest manmade lake in the world a virtual mirror of water. High temperatures averaging 30 degrees Celsius or 86 degrees Fahrenheit exposed to 3400 hours of sunlight per year, result in high evaporation and wasted water in a region where it is scarce and very much in demand.

Pedro Alves da Costa from the fishermen’s union of Remanso connects the destruction of the river with the destruction of local culture. He recalls, “The old sail boats would go up river selling salt and sugar and return with spirits and dried salted fish.They would go along selling these products and carrying musicians and poets to the different cities along the river. This informal commerce was part of the region’s culture, but today because of the dams and all the sand that has settled in the river bed, the boats can no longer sail and that way of live has been destroyed”.

Valdisio, a resident of Remanso, has been a fisherman for 35 years. He remembers that before the dam they were able to plant crops in the floodplains, using the natural rhythms of the river’s flood regimes. “Every year, before the construction of Sobradinho dam the flood cycle was the same and we used that to plant our crops in the floodplains to supplement our incomes, today we can no longer do that. Now there are some months I average about $400-$600 Reais ($105 – 131 US) from fishing, other months I average $200 Reais ($52 US). We can no longer survive from fishing alone and we can no longer supplement our income with floodplain agriculture so have to look for construction work instead”.

The fishermen of the lower river in the city of Penedo, Alagoas are not near any dams, but their city is close to the mouth of the river. According to Edesio Vieira, a fisherman from Penedo, “The greatest sign of the river’s death is that it no longer lives out the natural cycle of flood regimes, it was this cycle that used to clean out the river of all its pollutants, today the river is weak”. By the time the waters reach that city they have flowed through the many dams, gathered toxins along the way and arrive with virtually no native fish species. The fishermen of the area have been organized into a union since 1929 and they do not want to let go of their way of life. Instead they have resorted to psiculture. Alfredo Fernandes, president of the union describes the project, “The hatchery project initiated out of necessity to find alternatives because there were no more fish in the river. We buy Thai Tilapia and place them in cages in the river; we feed them, raise them and then sell them. It has not been easy, we are learning by doing and the initial costs have been very high, especially the feed”.

Fishermen from Penedo and Remanso are using their unions to help preserve the river and organize with other social groups to secure its healthy revitalization. “If we don’t preserve the river there will be 15 million people from this region trying to migrate to larger cities across the country or die of hunger”, says Pedro. These fishermen also organize with other groups in their region to raise awareness about the river. In the city of Penedo for instance, every year the fishermen conduct meetings with other local groups ranging from businesses to schools to celebrate October fourth, the feast of São Francisco. The celebration involves clean up activities, essay contents about the river in local schools and musical performances.

“There are some things that have to come from us”, says Pedro, “ the revitalization project needs to come from us. I don’t believe in any preservation effort that doesn’t involve the local community. If the government decides to do it by themselves and then shove it down our throats it won’t work. Revitalization needs to start with educating local communities about the environment they live in”.


The Church


“From the green Canastra Mountains through shoots and falls playing among the rocks like a mischievous boy, the river runs to the semi-arid. Like the saint who bears his name, the river was born in the lush and wealthy mountains of Minas Gerais and took a vow of poverty to serve the underprivileged of the dry Brazilian Northeast; he brings life to 15 million human beings. His destiny is to live to serve the poor and to die generating life”.
Frei Luiz Cappio, clergyman


Frei Luiz Flavio Cappio is a Franciscan monk and the bishop of Barra, a city that lies along the margins of the São Francisco River. Much like the river, he too was born among wealth and after working with migrant workers from the Northeast in São Paulo took on a vow of poverty and chose to live in the sertão. “At the core of the Franciscan spirit lies a love for life and nature” says the Frei, “that is why I chose to do a year long pilgrimage on foot and boat starting at the spring in the Canastra Mountains to the mouth of the river”. The purpose of this pilgrimage was to raise the awareness of riverine communities as to the river’s destruction. In every community he went Frei Luiz heard stories about the river’s importance to that community, its ailing health, the lack of fish and the pollution. “Every morning when the women wake up, they go to the river to wash their face. They pour the water on their foreheads and ask for the river’s blessing. This river is vital to these communities and they are ready to do what they can to defend it”.

The Catholic Church is very prominent in the region and it too has been drawn into the struggle for revitalization. During the 30 plus years of military dictatorship in Brazil the Church was the only institution that was not shut down for organizing against the military regime. In the spirit of liberation theology radical members of the clergy rose to support human rights issues during those repressive times. It is in this spirit that many clergymen like Frei Luiz use their influence with the population to raise consciousness and educate them about preservation.

Every year for the last 25 years, the Church organizes the Romaria das Terras e das Aguas – The Pilgrimage for Land and Water. This pilgrimage draws thousands of people from the Northeast, but it is goal is not solely for worship; rather it is a time for communities, NGOs, church groups, and unions to discuss the politics of land and water. The Romaria was started 25 years ago when a group of five men came from the state of Ceara in a beat up lorry to worship at the holy grotto of Lapa. They came to pray for land. In their time land distribution was a major problem in Brazil as it continues to be today. This first trip became folklore in the region and today the Romaria attracts thousands of others who come to ask God for land and water rights. Church organizers see the merits of opening political discussion about these issues. “ The main problem in this country is agrarian reform, without it there will always be unequal distribution of wealth: who owns the land owns the water, and in this dry region the lack of water means death. Who controls the water controls the people,” says Frei Luiz. The Romaria lasts three days and is filled with workshops and discussion ranging from the revitalization of the river to agrarian reform.

Frei Luiz believes that “The people are essential to any preservation effort because the river is an integral part of their lives. I believe in change from below, change from above is imposition”.


Non-Governmental Organizations


“The preservation of the river is more than an ecological salvage; it is also a recovery of the culture of the people of the São Francisco River Valley. Revitalization is therefore, more than an ecological task it is about social inclusion. Without the local population there will be no revitalization for the river, without policies that generate an improvement in the quality of life of the people of the valley there will be no revitalization”.
Anselmo Souza – Gambá, local environmental NGO, 2002


Behind the scenes of the revitalization efforts are non-governmental organizations. Many are environmentalists, while others are concerned with the social, economic and political rights of the people of the Valley. In the mid 1990’s the idea of transferring the river’s waters to other states in the Northeast began gaining support with local and federal politicians. For those concerned with the river, the water transfer project would create a further strain to the already ailing river. In response, civil society began a massive organizational campaign to halt this destructive project. Out of this organizational effort surged the Permanent Defense Forum of the São Francisco River. “The forum was crucial to halt the water transfer project. People took to the streets and demanded that the government abandon the idea of transferring the river’s waters. We feel that the level of public awareness about the river grew significantly after this campaign”, says Marina Braga of the Pastoral Land Commission.

Today the Forum contains over 30 organizations ranging from environmental NGO’s to church groups, unions, community organizations and small farmer initiatives. It is an all-inclusive entity that attempts to organize civil society in preserving the river. The NGOs play a fundamental role in this organizational effort, according to Anselmo Souza of Gambá, “The NGOs set up organizing networks and dispense much of the information about the efforts to revitalize the river. We bring together many groups of people, from local communities to engineers and we have the capacity to disseminate information and lobby government”. The Forum holds regular local, state, and regional meetings where they discuss pro-active measures and day-to-day initiatives to preserve the river. The Forum functions to disseminate information, monitor large users, denounce damaging actions, update participating members on government initiatives and to organize civil society in the struggle to save the river. They constantly keep pressure on government leader to carry out more democratic policies. This pressure ensured the temporary halt of the water transfer project and has shifted government attention to the revitalization of the river. According to Gogo Malvezzi of the Pastoral Land Commission “The forum started as a reaction to the water transfer project, but today it focuses on uniting civil society to pursue an inclusive debate about revitalization. There is a need for a central organ in civil society to articulate a unified platform to the government about the river and potential preservation efforts from below”.

The hydroelectric plant of Sobradinho lies in the middle of the river and is one of 7 power plants on the basin.

There is a divergence between civil society’s quest for a healthy river and government and business interests in the region and in the water. According to Malvezzi, “The crisis of water in the São Francisco River Valley symbolizes the larger national and international crisis of degradation and exploitation of the world’s rivers for profit”. In response to civil society’s efforts the government decreed on June of 2001 a Committee inclusive of all users to monitor and manage decisions concerning the river. This watershed committee represents all interests and aims to create a policy making body that is truly democratic and inclusive in its decision making. The participating representatives include business and user interests, like electricity companies and irrigation projects, as well as municipal, state, and federal leaders, and members of civil society. About 27% of the seats in the committee are designated for civil society, 40% to business and user interests and the remaining 33% of the seats have been designated for local, state and federal representatives. This Committee will manage all of the preservation efforts, stimulate discussion to decide on sustainable development tactic for the region, and establish a plan for managing water. The Committee has establisehd a space for social negotiation where all interested agents debate their proposals. Members hope that his mechanism will help provide some transparency in the policy making process. One of the main tasks of this Committee will be to outline, implement and ensure the revitalization of the river. Members of civil society are suspicious of the committee, Malvezzi says, “The Committee has a potential for both success and disaster. We are not sure how much leverage civil society will have amidst the great economic interest of the other users”.

The revitalization of the river remains an intention that means different things to different users. Despite the ambivalence behind this project it should be brought to reflect the aspirations and needs of the people of the valley. It is, nonetheless, an opportunity for different groups in society to express their interests and together mobilize for a more democratic and just approach to policies that concern their livelihoods.

The author is a graduate student at the University of California Berkeley School of Public Policy. The text was a result of 8 weeks of field research in the São Francisco River Valley in the summer of 2002. For more information on the River and current projects refer to www.irn.org/programs/latamerica/saofrancisco.pdf

 

The village of Cabeço, which was inundated by the sea. The river is losing strength and the sea is advancing into it.

 

 

Research and Resources:
Graduate Students

Support for Graduate Student Research
Summer Research Reports Archive
 
© 2007, The Regents of the University of California, Last Updated - August 24, 2003