2005
Tinker Summer Research Report
Camila
H. Piñeiro
Latin American Studies
“Participatory Democracy in Venezuela” |
 |
Agricultural
cooperative El Lucero Grande, established
in NUDE La Hacienda Sanz, Miranda State.
(Núcleos
de Desarrollo Endógeno-NUDEs -
are local development zones.) |
I arrived in Caracas with two objectives. First,
to assess the extent to which participatory democracy
is taking place in Venezuela , and to assess how recent
Constitutional reforms and other new laws have been
implemented in practice. Also, I was hoping to determine
a specific topic and case study for my MA degree thesis
project.
Initially, I had planned to study the functioning
of newly-formed Local Public Planning Councils (Consejos
Locales de Planificación Pública-
CLPP). But once there, I learned that there were only
a few CLPP actually in operation because -in order
to comply with the time frame established by Article
182 of the Constitution and the Law of Local Public
Planning Councils- a significant number were created
without the required participation of the communities.
CLPP are now in a process of legitimization, but it
seems that we’ll have to wait some time before
a significant number of experiences are consolidated.
 |
Construction
cooperative La Matoma, contracted by GOL
to repair street in barrio Nuevo Horizontes,
Parroquia Sucre, Caracas.
|
On
the other hand, several visits to “barrios” in
Caracas (Nuevo Horizontes in Parroquia
Sucre; Las Casitas in Parroquia La
Vega) revealed myriad spaces for local participation,
such as land, water, health and sports committees -spread
all over Caracas and other states- where the community
has the opportunity to evaluate their situation on
a specific issue, then decide solutions and demand
action from the appropriate governmental institutions.
At a meeting on community participation organized by
the Intergovernmental Fund for Decentralization (Fondo
Intergubernamental para la Descentralización-
FIDES) I learned about the Local Works Cabinet (Gabinetes
de Obras Locales- GOLs) promoted by the Public
Works Division (Dirección de Obras)
of the municipality Libertador, Caracas’ main
municipality . GOLs are spaces where neighbors organize
themselves in working tables to decide which public
works on infrastructure should be done, and supervise
them. But what struck me the most was that the community
could also decide which cooperatives in the neighborhood
would carry out the work. In 2004, 50 percent of all
the projects in the municipality were carried out by
170 cooperatives, amounting to almost $1 million (2
billion Bs) [Marta Harnecker: La Experiencia del
Presupuesto Participativo de Caracas, December
2004].
To
my surprise, I found that it wasn’t
only this public institution that was opening spaces
for small enterprises, and especially, cooperatives.
CADELA, one of the five regional branches of the
state-owned national electricity company, CADAFE,
encouraged their maintenance and security subcontracted
workers to leave their private business and form
their own cooperatives. CADELA, an enterprise under
co-management, has been very supportive of cooperatives-
575 cooperatives have been contracted for more than
$3.2 million (7 billion Bs) in 2004 and almost $3
million (6 billion Bs) from January to June 2005
[CADELA: Informe NO. 21040-0000-26,
July 2005]. Similarly, most of the stations of Caracas ’ state-owned
rapid transportation system are maintained by cooperatives
created by employees of former private businesses.
Even the International Youth Festival that took place
in Caracas this August was a space for cooperatives-
Caracas’ municipality contracted 45 food elaboration
cooperatives and 3 transportation cooperatives to feed
and move around more than 20,000 participants for a
week [Rosangel Sánchez: statements by the director
of the Logistics Commission, August 2005].
So
I decided to focus my fieldwork on cooperatives.
I designed a survey with questions regarding their
internal organization, commitment to technical formation
and education on cooperative values, connection to
their community, relationship to credits, plans for
growth, relations with state institutions, level
of integration, and foresights of their future, among
other topics. I interviewed 25 cooperatives, mostly
services (14: food processing-4; cleaning- 3; turism-2;
technical-2; security-1; transport-1; social services-1),
production (7: confections-2; food-2; agriculture-2;
media-1), construction (2) and mixed (2); mostly
from Caracas , but also 4 from the Miranda state
and 2 from Mérida state.
 |
Tourism
cooperative Ruta Bolivaria brings public
school children to an art museum in Caracas. |
I found cooperatives everywhere. This proliferation
originates from their presence throughout the Constitution
and other laws as new economic actors within the social
economy, and one which should be supported by the state.
In March 2004, the Misión Vuelvan Caras was
created to prepare and help marginalized Venezuelans
-mostly recent graduates from other educational missions-
to participate in the economy, preferable in the form
of cooperatives. Since August 2004 -after the Chavez
government won the referendum and took a break from
the opposition- cooperatives have gained more momentum
because they have been referred as the vanguard of
the endogenous development model, on which the government
would concentrate its efforts. A Ministry of Popular
Economy (Ministerio de Economía Popular-MINEP)
was created in September 2004 to support and institutionalize Vuelvan
Caras, provide infrastructure and credits for
cooperatives, among other functions related to the
new economic model. I interviewed Juan Carlos Jimenez,
director of the minister’s office; Ali Peña,
director of Public Policies Control and Evaluation;
and José Marcelino Salcedo, director of Asistence
and Comercialization; to learn about MINEP’s
work, their difficulties and their future plans to
ensure cooperatives’ success. I learned that
MINEP graduated 195,000 students from Vuelvan Caras between
December, 2004 and May, 2005; most of them organized
in 6,714 cooperatives, some of which are integrated
in more than 100 development zones (Núcleos
de Desarrollo Endógeno-NUDEs).
In interviews with Carlos Molina, the superintendent
of the National Superintendence of Cooperatives (Superintendencia
Nacional de Cooperativas-SUNACOOP), Juana Morgado
(fiscal in the Dirección de Gestión Cooperativa)
and Shelly Chacon (director of the Dirección
de Consultoría Jurídica), I learned about
their concerns with the functioning of the cooperatives,
the changes they have been doing to improve their services
and supervision of cooperatives, and future plans for
the integration and consolidation of the cooperative
movement in Venezuela. I also interviewed Oscar Bastidas,
cooperativist and professor; Edgar de la Vega, community
leader of barrio Las Casitas; Edgar Rivas, director
of the Community Participation Division at FIDES; Henry
Navas, director of Popular Economy at the government
of the estate of Mérida; Rubén Linares,
leader of the new union Workers National Union (Union
Nacional de Trabajadores- UNT) and others.
In
short, I noted the central role that cooperatives
are playing in public policies in Venezuela today
and the potential for a cooperative movement that
guides a more social and participatory economy. Thus,
I’ve
decided to go back to Venezuela this winter break to
follow-up with some of the cooperatives I’ve
interviewed, identify more cooperatives, and evaluate
the status of the cooperative movement. My goal is
to obtain evidence that will indicate to what extent
cooperatives are desirable economic and social actors
in an alternative economic model.
 |
Shoe
manufacturing cooperative Venezuela Avanza,
established in NUDE Fabricio Ojeda, Caracas. |